Additional notes

//Experiencing a different kind of reality isn’t necessarily such an unusual thing. But the concept of an ultimate reality is not a new one.

A great article:

Spontaneously occuring mystical experiences

  • similar to spontaneously occurring mystical experiences.
  • The University was partly funded by National Institute of Drug Abuse, who was interested in the therapeutic potential of psychedelics in treating depression, PTSD, and addictions.
  • The results were promising. It appears that psychedelics increase neuroplasticity, which leads to rapid learning and in some cases, psychological transformation.
  • appeared that in many cases they allowed patients to …[how does it work]
  • [Stats]
  • But there was a subgroup of patents who had better results with curbing their addictions than the rest. These were the people who described their trip as a kind of ‘mystical experience’.
  • https://files.csp.org/Psilocybin/Garcia-Romeu2014Smoking.pdf
  • As it turns out, there was a precedent. Back in 1962, the scientific study of psychedelics began.
  • At John’s Hopkins, it started with a project called the Good Friday Experiment.
  • [describe it]

Other concepts throughout history

  • People have looked for meaning in a million different ways in a million different places throughout time.
  • You are not the first, and it is a hugely worthwhile question.
  • Perhaps equivalents exist in every culture, and is just expressed through the lens of their cultural and religious institutions and imbued with local mythologies.
  • In Europe it probably found expression through Christianity, philosophy, and the occult.
  • In China through Buddhism and zen.
  • In India through Shiva.
  • In the Middle East through Islam.
  • In the native communities of Africa, Australia, and the Americas, who knows.
  • But also in smaller movements, like the Romantic poet's Pantheism.

Modern research

Psychedelics and experienced meditators

  • Psychedelics and experienced meditators turn off some of the most recently developed areas of the mind. This has been measured in a lab setting with MRI scans. The sense of autobiographical self, imagining the mental states of others, a sense of time, among other things.
  • With this turned off, you return to the latent, more primitive 'animal' brain that was always there. But you keep your human understanding. You see everything that you already know, but without a sense of self. Without an 'ego', and the narratives you have created around yourself - both culturally and individually.
  • With this part of the brain inactive, other parts of the brain start to communicate with each other when they wouldn't usually. You get to see your own senses and thoughts from a different perspective.
  • Eyeshades.
  • Your flight instructions: If you see something scary, don't run away from it. Either step right up to it and say 'what are you doing in my head?' Or 'what have you got to teach me, or surrender to it. Relax and float downstream.
  • What we do to nature has a lot to do with the fact that we objectify nature. We see ourselves as the only subject. Everything else is just an object. Most of us don't see it as animate. That it is alive.
  • We are out of balance in so far as our ego has total dominance over our thinking, this is what it leads to, and it needs to be corrected.

Story: The Last Messiah

  • One night in long bygone times, man awoke and *saw himself*.
  • He saw that he was naked under cosmos, homeless in his own body. All things dissolved before his testing thought, wonder above wonder, horror above horror unfolded in his mind.
  • Then woman too awoke and said it was time to go and slay. And he fetched his bow and arrow, a fruit of the marriage of spirit and hand, and went outside beneath the stars. But as the beasts arrived at their waterholes where he expected them of habit, he felt no more the tiger’s bound in his blood, but a great psalm about the brotherhood of suffering between everything alive.
  • That day he did not return with prey, and when they found him by the next new moon, he was sitting dead by the waterhole.
  • II**
  • Whatever happened? A breach in the very unity of life, a biological paradox, an abomination, an absurdity, an exaggeration of disastrous nature. Life had overshot its target, blowing itself apart. A species had been armed too heavily – by spirit made almighty without, but equally a menace to its own well-being. Its weapon was like a sword without hilt or plate, a two-edged blade cleaving everything; but he who is to wield it must grasp the blade and turn the one edge toward himself.
  • Despite his new eyes, man was still rooted in matter, his soul spun into it and subordinated to its blind laws. And yet he could see matter as a stranger, compare himself to all phenomena, see through and locate his vital processes. He comes to nature as an unbidden guest, in vain extending his arms to beg conciliation with his maker: Nature answers no more, it performed a miracle with man, but later did not know him. He has lost his right of residence in the universe, has eaten from the Tree of Knowledge and been expelled from Paradise. He is mighty in the near world, but curses his might as purchased with his harmony of soul, his innocence, his inner peace in life’s embrace.
  • So there he stands with his visions, betrayed by the universe, in wonder and fear. The beast knew fear as well, in thunderstorms and on the lion’s claw. But man became fearful of life itself – indeed, of his very being. Life – that was for the beast to feel the play of power, it was heat and games and strife and hunger, and then at last to bow before the law of course. In the beast, suffering is self-confined, in man, it knocks holes into a fear of the world and a despair of life. Even as the child sets out on the river of life, the roars from the waterfall of death rise highly above the vale, ever closer, and tearing, tearing at its joy. Man beholds the earth, and it is breathing like a great lung; whenever it exhales, delightful life swarms from all its pores and reaches out toward the sun, but when it inhales, a moan of rupture passes through the multitude, and corpses whip the ground like bouts of hail. Not merely his own day could he see, the graveyards wrung themselves before his gaze, the laments of sunken millennia wailed against him from the ghastly decaying shapes, the earth-turned dreams of mothers. Future’s curtain unravelled itself to reveal a nightmare of endless repetition, a senseless squander of organic material. The suffering of human billions makes its entrance into him through the gateway of compassion, from all that happen arises a laughter to mock the demand for justice, his profoundest ordering principle. He sees himself emerge in his mother’s womb, he holds up his hand in the air and it has five branches; whence this devilish number five, and what has it to do with my soul? He is no longer obvious to himself – he touches his body in utter horror; this is you and so far do you extend and no farther. He carries a meal within him, yesterday it was a beast that could itself dash around, now I suck it up and make it part of me, and where do I begin and end? All things chain together in causes and effects, and everything he wants to grasp dissolves before the testing thought. Soon he sees mechanics even in the so-far whole and dear, in the smile of his beloved – there are other smiles as well, a torn boot with toes. Eventually, the features of things are features only of himself. Nothing exists without himself, every line points back at him, the world is but a ghostly echo of his voice – he leaps up loudly screaming and wants to disgorge himself onto the earth along with his impure meal, he feels the looming of madness and wants to find death before losing even such ability.
  • But as he stands before imminent death, he grasps its nature also, and the cosmic import of the step to come. His creative imagination constructs new, fearful prospects behind the curtain of death, and he sees that even there is no sanctuary found. And now he can discern the outline of his biologicocosmic terms: He is the universe’s helpless captive, kept to fall into nameless possibilities.
  • From this moment on, he is in a state of relentless panic.
  • Such a ‘*feeling of cosmic panic*’ is pivotal to every human mind. Indeed, the race appears destined to perish in so far as any effective preservation and continuation of life is ruled out when all of the individual’s attention and energy goes to endure, or relay, the catastrophic high tension within.
  • The tragedy of a species becoming unfit for life by overevolving one ability is not confined to humankind. Thus it is thought, for instance, that certain deer in paleontological times succumbed as they acquired overly-heavy horns. The mutations must be considered blind, they work, are thrown forth, without any contact of interest with their environment.
  • In depressive states, the mind may be seen in the image of such an antler, in all its fantastic splendour pinning its bearer to the ground.
  • III**
  • Why, then, has mankind not long ago gone extinct during great epidemics of madness? Why do only a fairly minor number of individuals perish because they fail to endure the strain of living – because cognition gives them more than they can carry?
  • Cultural history, as well as observation of ourselves and others, allow the following answer: Most people learn to save themselves by artificially limiting the content of consciousness.
  • If the giant deer, at suitable intervals, had broken off the outer spears of its antlers, it might have kept going for some while longer. Yet in fever and constant pain, indeed, in betrayal of its central idea, the core of its peculiarity, for it was vocated by creation’s hand to be the *horn bearer* of wild animals. What it gained in continuance, it would lose in significance, in grandness of life, in other words a continuance without hope, a march not *up to* affirmation, but forth across its ever recreated ruins, a self-destructive race against the sacred will of blood.
  • The identity of purpose and perishment is, for giant deer and man alike, the tragic paradox of life. In devoted *Bejahung*, the last *Cervis Giganticus* bore the badge of its lineage to its end. The human being saves itself and carries on. It performs, to extend a settled phrase, a more or less self-conscious *repression* of its damaging surplus of consciousness. This process is virtually constant during our waking and active hours, and is a requirement of social adaptability and of everything commonly referred to as healthy and normal living.
  • Psychiatry even works on the assumption that the ‘healthy’ and viable is at one with the highest in personal terms. Depression, ‘fear of life,’ refusal of nourishment and so on are invariably taken as signs of a pathological state and treated thereafter. Often, however, such phenomena are messages from a deeper, more immediate sense of life, bitter fruits of a geniality of thought or feeling at the root of antibiological tendencies. It is not the soul being sick, but its protection failing, or else being rejected because it is experienced – correctly – as a betrayal of ego’s highest potential.
  • The whole of living that we see before our eyes today is from inmost to outmost enmeshed in repressional mechanisms, social and individual; they can be traced right into the tritest formulas of everyday life. Though they take a vast and multifarious variety of forms, it seems legitimate to at least identify four major kinds, naturally occuring in every possible combination: isolation, anchoring, distraction and sublimation.
  • By *isolation* I here mean a fully arbitrary dismissal from consciousness of all disturbing and destructive thought and feeling. (Engström: “One should not think, it is just confusing.”) A perfect and almost brutalising variant is found among certain physicians, who for self-protection will only see the technical aspect of their profession. It can also decay to pure hooliganism, as among petty thugs and medical students, where any sensitivity to the tragic side of life is eradicated by violent means (football played with cadaver heads, and so on.)
  • In everyday interaction, isolation is manifested in a general code of mutual silence: primarily toward children, so these are not at once scared senseless by the life they have just begun, but retain their illusions until they can afford to lose them. In return, children are not to bother the adults with untimely reminders of sex, toilet, or death. Among adults there are the rules of ‘tact,’ the mechanism being openly displayed when a man who weeps on the street is removed with police assistance.
  • The mechanism of *anchoring* also serves from early childhood; parents, home, the street become matters *of course* to the child and give it a sense of assurance. This sphere of experience is the first, and perhaps the happiest, protection against the cosmos that we ever get to know in life, a fact that doubtless also explains the much debated ‘infantile bonding;’ the question of whether that is sexually tainted too is unimportant here. When the child later discovers that those fixed points are as ‘arbitrary’ and ‘ephemeral’ as any others, it has a crisis of confusion and anxiety and promptly looks around for another anchoring. “In Autumn, I will attend middle school.” If the substitution somehow fails, then the crisis may take a fatal course, or else what I will call an *anchoring spasm* occurs: One clings to the dead values, concealing as well as possible from oneself and others the fact that they are unworkable, that one is spiritually insolvent. The result is lasting insecurity, ‘feelings of inferiority,’ over-compensation, restlessness. Insofar as this state falls into certain categories, it is made subject to psychoanalytic treatment, which aims to complete the transition to new anchorings.
  • Anchoring might be characterised as a fixation of points within, or construction of walls around, the liquid fray of consciousness. Though typically unconscious, it may also be fully conscious (one ‘adopts a goal’.) Publicly useful anchorings are met with sympathy, he who ‘sacrifices himself totally’ for his anchoring (the firm, the cause) is idolised. He has established a mighty bulwark against the dissolution of life, and others are by suggestion gaining from his strength. In a brutalised form, as deliberate action, it is found among ‘decadent’ playboys (“one should get married in time, and then the constraints will come of themselves.”) Thus one establishes a necessity in one’s life, exposing oneself to an obvious evil from one’s point of view, but a soothing of the nerves, a high-walled container for a sensibility to life that has been growing increasingly crude. Ibsen presents, in Hjalmar Ekdal and Molvik, two flowering cases (‘living lies’); there is no difference between their anchoring and that of the pillars of society except for the practico-economic unproductiveness of the former.
  • Any culture is a great, rounded system of anchorings, built on foundational firmaments, the basic cultural ideas. The average person makes do with the collective firmaments, the personality is building for himself, the person of character has finished his construction, more or less grounded on the inherited, collective main firmaments (God, the Church, the State, morality, fate, the law of life, the people, the future). The closer to main firmaments a certain carrying element is, the more perilous it is to touch. Here a direct protection is normally established by means of penal codes and threats of prosecution (inquisition, censorship, the Conservative approach to life).
  • The carrying capacity of each segment either depends on its fictitious nature having not been seen through yet, or else on its being recognised as necessary anyway. Hence the religious education in schools, which even atheists support because they know no other way to bring children into social ways of response.
  • Whenever people realise the fictitiousness or redundancy of the segments, they will strive to replace them with new ones (‘the limited duration of Truths’) – and whence flows all the spiritual and cultural strife which, along with economic competition, forms the dynamic content of world history.
  • The craving for material goods (power) is not so much due to the direct pleasures of wealth, as none can be seated on more than one chair or eat himself more than sated. Rather, the value of a fortune to life consists in the rich opportunities for anchoring and distraction offered to the owner.
  • Both for collective and individual anchorings it holds that when a segment breaks, there is a crisis that is graver the closer that segment to main firmaments. Within the inner circles, sheltered by the outer ramparts, such crises are daily and fairly painfree occurrences (‘disappointments’); even a playing with anchoring values is here seen (wittiness, jargon, alcohol). But during such play one may accidentally rip a hole right to the bottom, and the scene is instantly transformed from euphoric to macabre. The dread of being stares us in the eye, and in a deadly gush we perceive how the minds are dangling in threads of their own spinning, and that a hell is lurking underneath.
  • The very foundational firmaments are rarely replaced without great social spasms and a risk of complete dissolution (reformation, revolution). During such times, individuals are increasingly left to their own devices for anchoring, and the number of failures tends to rise. Depressions, excesses, and suicides result (German officers after the war, Chinese students after the revolution).
  • Another flaw of the system is the fact that various danger fronts often require very different firmaments. As a logical superstructure is built upon each, there follow clashes of incommensurable modes of feeling and thought. Then despair can enter through the rifts. In such cases, a person may be obsessed with destructive joy, dislodging the whole artificial apparatus of his life and starting with rapturous horror to make a clean sweep of it. The horror stems from the loss of all sheltering values, the rapture from his by now ruthless identification and harmony with our nature’s deepest secret, the biological unsoundness, the enduring disposition for doom.
  • We love the anchorings for saving us, but also hate them for limiting our sense of freedom. Whenever we feel strong enough, we thus take pleasure in going together to bury an expired value in style. Material objects take on a symbolic import here (the Radical approach to life).
  • When a human being has eliminated those of his anchorings that are visible to himself, only the unconscious ones staying put, then he will call himself a liberated personality.
  • A very popular mode of protection is *distraction*. One limits attention to the critical bounds by constantly enthralling it with impressions. This is typical even in childhood; without distraction, the child is also insufferable to itself. “Mom, what am I to do.” A little English girl visiting her Norwegian aunts came inside from her room, saying: “What happens now?” The nurses attain virtuosity: Look, a doggie! Watch, they are painting the palace! The phenomenon is too familiar to require any further demonstration. Distraction is, for example, the ‘high society’s’ tactic for living. It can be likened to a flying machine – made of heavy material, but embodying a principle that keeps it airborne whenever applying. It must always be in motion, as air only carries it fleetingly. The pilot may grow drowsy and comfortable out of habit, but the crisis is acute as soon as the engine flunks.
  • The tactic is often fully conscious. Despair may dwell right underneath and break through in gushes, in a sudden sobbing. When all distractive options are expended, spleen sets in, ranging from mild indifference to fatal depression. Women, in general less cognition-prone and hence more secure in their living than men, preferably use distraction.
  • A considerable evil of imprisonment is the denial of most distractive options. And as terms for deliverance by other means are poor as well, the prisoner will tend to stay in the close vicinity of despair. The acts he then commits to deflect the final stage have a warrant in the principle of vitality itself. In such a moment he is experiencing his soul within the universe, and has no other motive than the utter inendurability of that condition.
  • Pure examples of life-panic are presumably rare, as the protective mechanisms are refined and automatic and to some extent unremitting. But even the adjacent terrain bears the mark of death, life is here barely sustainable and by great efforts. Death always appears as an escape, one ignores the possibilities of the hereafter, and as the way death is experienced is partly dependent on feeling and perspective, it might be quite an acceptable solution. If one in *statu mortis* could manage a pose (a poem, a gesture, to ‘die standing up’), i.e. a final anchoring, or a final distraction (Aases’ death), then such a fate is not the worst one at all. The press, for once serving the concealment mechanism, never fails to find reasons that cause no alarm – “it is believed that the latest fall in the price of wheat...”
  • When a human being takes his life in depression, this is a *natural death* of spiritual causes. The modern barbarity of ‘saving’ the suicidal is based on a hairraising misapprehension of the nature of existence.
  • Only a limited part of humanity can make do with mere ‘changes’, whether in work, social life, or entertainment. The cultured person demands connections, lines, a progression in the changes. Nothing finite satisfies at length, one is ever proceeding, gathering knowledge, making a career. The phenomenon is known as ‘yearning’ or ‘transcendental tendency.’ Whenever a goal is reached, the yearning moves on; hence its object is not the goal, but the very attainment of it – the gradient, not the absolute height, of the curve representing one’s life. The promotion from private to corporal may give a more valuable experience than the one from colonel to general. Any grounds of ‘progressive optimism’ are removed by this major psychological law.
  • The human yearning is not merely marked by a ‘striving toward’, but equally by an ‘escape from.’ And if we use the word in a religious sense, only the latter description fits. For here, none has yet been clear about what he is longing *for*, but one has always a heartfelt awareness of what one is longing *away from*, namely the earthly vale of tears, one’s own inendurable condition. If awareness of this predicament is the deepest stratum of the soul, as argued above, then it is also understandable why the religious yearning is felt and experienced as fundamental. By contrast, the hope that it forms a divine criterion, which harbours a promise of its own fulfilment, is placed in a truly melancholy light by these considerations.
  • The fourth remedy against panic, *sublimation*, is a matter of transformation rather than repression. Through stylistic or artistic gifts can the very pain of living at times be converted into valuable experiences. Positive impulses engage the evil and put it to their own ends, fastening onto its pictorial, dramatic, heroic, lyric or even comic aspects.
  • Unless the worst sting of suffering is blunted by other means, or denied control of the mind, such utilisation is unlikely, however. (Image: The mountaineer does not *enjoy* his view of the abyss while choking with vertigo; only when this feeling is more or less overcome does he enjoy it – anchored.) To write a tragedy, one must to some extent free oneself from – betray – the very feeling of tragedy and regard it from an outer, e.g. aesthetic, point of view. Here is, by the way, an opportunity for the wildest round-dancing through ever higher ironic levels, into a most embarrassing *circulus vitiosus*. Here one can chase one’s ego across numerous habitats, enjoying the capacity of the various layers of consciousness to dispel one another.
  • The present essay is a typical attempt at sublimation. The author does not suffer, he is filling pages and is going to be published in a journal.
  • The ‘martyrdom’ of lonely ladies also shows a kind of sublimation – they gain in significance thereby.
  • Nevertheless, sublimation appears to be the rarest of the protective means mentioned here.
  • IV**
  • Is it possible for ‘primitive natures’ to renounce these cramps and cavorts and live in harmony with themselves in the serene bliss of labour and love? Insofar as they may be considered human at all, I think the answer must be no. The strongest claim to be made about the so-called peoples of nature is that they are somewhat closer to the wonderful biological ideal than we unnatural people. And when even we have so far been able to save a majority through every storm, we have been assisted by the sides of our nature that are just modestly or moderately developed. This positive basis (as protection alone cannot create life, only hinder its faltering) must be sought in the naturally adapted deployment of the energy in the body and the biologically helpful parts of the soul1, subject to such hardships as are *precisely* due to sensory limitations, bodily frailty, and the need to do work for life and love.
  • And just in this finite land of bliss within the fronts do the progressing civilisation, technology and standardisation have such a debasing influence. For as an ever growing fraction of the cognitive faculties retire from the game against the environment, there is a rising *spiritual unemployment*. The value of a technical advance to the whole undertaking of life must be judged by its contribution to the human opportunity for spiritual occupation. Though boundaries are blurry, perhaps the first tools for cutting might be mentioned as a case of a positive invention.
  • Other technical inventions enrich only the life of the inventor himself; they represent a gross and ruthless theft from humankind’s common reserve of experiences and should invoke the harshest punishment if made public against the veto of censorship. One such crime among numerous others is the use of flying machines to explore uncharted land. In a single vandalistic glob, one thus destroys lush opportunities for experience that could benefit many if each, by effort, obtained his fair share.2
  • The current phase of life’s chronic fever is particularly tainted by this circumstance. The absence of naturally (biologically) based spiritual activity shows up, for example, in the pervasive recourse to *distraction* (entertainment, sport, radio – ‘the rhythm of the times’). Terms for anchoring are not as favourable – all the inherited, collective systems of anchorings are punctured by criticism, and anxiety, disgust, confusion, despair leak in through the rifts (‘corpses in the cargo.’) Communism and psychoanalysis, however incommensurable otherwise, both attempt (as Communism has also a spiritual reflection) by novel means to vary the old escape anew; applying, respectively, violence and guile to make humans biologically fit by ensnaring their critical surplus of cognition. The idea, in either case, is uncannily logical. But again, it cannot yield a final solution. Though a deliberate degeneration to a more viable nadir may certainly save the species in the short run, it will by its nature be unable to find peace in such resignation, or indeed find any peace at all.
  • V**
  • If we continue these considerations to the bitter end, then the conclusion is not in doubt. As long as humankind recklessly proceeds in the fateful delusion of being biologically fated for triumph, nothing essential will change. As its numbers mount and the spiritual atmosphere thickens, the techniques of protection must assume an increasingly brutal character.
  • And humans will persist in dreaming of salvation and affirmation and a new Messiah. Yet when many saviours have been nailed to trees and stoned on the city squares, then the last Messiah shall come.
  • Then will appear the man who, as the first of all, has dared strip his soul naked and submit it alive to the outmost thought of the lineage, the very idea of doom. A man who has fathomed life and its cosmic ground, and whose pain is the Earth’s collective pain. With what furious screams shall not mobs of all nations cry out for his thousandfold death, when like a cloth his voice encloses the globe, and the strange message has resounded for the first and last time:
  • “– The life of the worlds is a roaring river, but Earth’s is a pond and a backwater.
  • – The sign of doom is written on your brows – how long will ye kick against the pin-pricks?
  • – But there is one conquest and one crown, one redemption and one solution.
  • – Know yourselves – *be infertile and let the earth be silent after ye*.”
  • And when he has spoken, they will pour themselves over him, led by the pacifier makers and the midwives, and bury him in their fingernails.
  • He is the last Messiah. As son from father, he stems from the archer by the waterhole.
  • Peter Wessel Zapffe, 1933*
  • Pasted from <https://philosophynow.org/issues/45/The_Last_Messiah>

Greek god Epiphany

  • I think that epiphany may mean the appearance of a god to a mortal.
  • This could also just mean the flash of a great idea, exactly what you need at exactly the right time.
  • Here is Apollon

[There was a pic that I took here]

Big History

  • Now that big data has had its 15 minutes in the spotlight, it’s time for “big history” to take the stage.
  • Big history is an emerging discipline that is redefining traditional approaches to history by synthesizing perspectives from disparate subjects to create a single, unified narrative. For example, Andrew Christian, the founding proponent of big history, starts his lectures with a discussion of the Big Bang. Big history’s unconventional approach to the subject has earned it many fans. Bill Gates has pumped funds into it and academic heavyweights are lining up to endorse the practice.
  • The origins of big history**
  • Big history emerged as a counter to the short-term approach that has plagued history as an academic subject in recent times. Scholars and academic have criticized this short-term approach because it does not result in lasting solutions.
  • The History Manifesto*, a book co-written by Harvard professor David Armitage and Yale historian Jo Guldi, strengthens the case for a big history perspective. The authors conducted research that quantified this approach. According to them, a majority of research in history departments between 1975 and 2005 focused on biological time spans of between five and 50 years. In 1900, the average number of years covered in doctoral dissertations in history in the United States was about 75 years; by 1975, it was closer to 30. Apart from a shortcut to an academic position, the main reason for a short-term approach to history was that it offered a convenient narrative for myth creation, as the topic related to business and political causes.
  • The fragmentation disconnected historical narratives from the center of a society to its margins. In the process, history was eclipsed as a discipline by other subjects, such as economics and sociology, which provided a contemporary and holistic nuance of modern society. Indeed, the most famous essay about history in the last 50 years, *The End of History*, was written by a political scientist, Francis Fukuyama.
  • Technology and history**
  • New technology products have bridged geographies and cultures, creating a more complex world. Issues are rarely what they seem; isolating cause and effect is the equivalent of finding a needle in an increasingly complicated haystack.
  • Big history relies on technological inventions to manage this mess. For example, big data is increasingly being used to discern patterns and establish grand narratives as they relate to historical watershed events, such as the Industrial revolution, or contemporary events, such as climate change.
  • Thus, geography is important but only so far as it serves the purpose of the main narrative. Similarly, economics is melded with sociological perspectives to create a grand narrative. Big history emphasizes the shared experiences of humanity or collective learning — the human “knack” for preserving information, sharing it with one another, and passing it onto the next generation.
  • The Industrial Revolution**
  • Typical historical narratives about the Industrial Revolution tend to restrict the events before and after the the revolution to Britain. However, the big history narrative eschews conventional narrative about the industrial revolution and instead focuses on the confluence of forces that led to it. Big history provides a mix of economic, sociological, and political reasons for development of the industrial revolution.
  • According to big history, world history was defined by four world zones: the Americas, Australasia, the Pacific, and Afro-Eurasia (a combination of Africa, Asia, and Europe). The zones developed separately before trade routes connected them. The industrial revolution occurred after these zones were connected. But, it would not have been possible without trade exchanges between Europe and Asia. This is because the industrial revolution used several products that were only made possible as a result of trade.
  • For example, paper and printing, which led to the age of Enlightenment in Europe, were invented in China. Spices, which made the East India Company a global superpower, were discovered in India. Big history also raises provocative questions about the revolution. For example, it discusses why Britain and not China became the site of the Industrial Revolution.
  • The answer to that question, according to big history, lies in a combination of concepts: political, cultural, and economic. For example, China’s cultural climate at the end of the Song dynasty in 1279 shifted away from innovation and commerce. The importance of new sources of energy and the role of increased energy consumption (see Climate Change) also gets more than a nodding glance.
  • Finally, the discipline compares the Industrial Revolution to the Cambrian explosion, which occurred several millenia earlier. But, the Cambrian explosion was biological; the Industrial revolution was cultural. And the cultural revolution sparked by the Industrial revolution is still continuing. In fact, we are only at the beginning of the modern revolution as compared to the agricultural revolution, which lasted thousands of years.
  • Climate change**
  • Climate change is a complicated issue. It encompasses a complex cocktail of economic forces, political grandstanding, and cultural mores. Big history can provide the necessary context for this problem.
  • The History Manifesto* suggests counterfactual thinking, or arriving at a solution by reversing known facts as an approach to the climate change problem. This is because attrition of natural resources or change in weather patterns is not an overnight phenomenon. It has occurred through regular and sustained use of resources over the last hundreds of years. In effect, it is rooted in modern lifestyles, which are reliant on energy and largely a product of the industrial revolution.
  • Consider the following statistics. In the paleolithic era, each human used between 2,000 and 3,000 kilocalories of energy each day. With domestication through agriculture, this number increased to 20,000 kilocalories. In early 21st Century, a typical human being uses 200,000 kilocalories of energy daily.
  • Most of this energy is derived from non-renewable sources of energy, such as fossil fuels. Western countries, such as the United States, expended much capital and labor in exploiting natural resources to develop their economies. However, diminishing reserves of fossil fuels means that we need to cut down our emissions and shift to newer supplies of fuel.
  • Scientists, such as geneticist farmer Wes Jackson from the Land Institute in Kansas, use an interdisciplinary counterfactual approach to find answers to these questions. He worked with mathematicians to analyze data “about the scale of commodity networks necessary for there to be a tractor on his farm.” Jackson asked a series of counterfactual questions to determine the effect of energy on his farm. He asked himself whether his farm would be seriously affected if there were no state to provide highways upon which the farm used to transport edibles. Would tractor-based farming still be possible in this part of the world?
  • The idea and assumptions are interesting because they require an understanding of historical perspective. Absence of state highways and tractors implies a farm unable to keep pace with the modern world. It also implies a farm that is independent of commonly available sources of energy from fossil fuels. Does this approach then mean that we should return to an agragarian society? The big history perspective may be useful in providing an answer to this question
  • Read more: http://www.cheatsheet.com/business/why-big-history-changes-how-we-think-about-business-and-technology.html/?a=viewall#ixzz3mGmlCbk1

We are all god

  • Through annihilation of the ego, each person has the potential to realize that they are God embodied. Jesus Christ did this.
  • Logan Allen‏ @yungdeleuze

Samadhi

Invent your own spirit guide

  • Prometheus as the Red Bellied Black snake.
  • Alan Moore's serpent-god.

Spinozism

This is pretty much it, God is infinite and everything and synonymous with Nature. Except thrown in there is Determinism too.

Agnosticism

  • Martin Amis from <https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Martin_Amis>
    • Much more recently I reclassified myself as an agnostic. Atheism, it turns out, is not quite rational either. The sketchiest acquaintance with cosmology will tell you that the universe is not, or is not yet, decipherable by human beings. It will also tell you that the universe is far more bizarre, prodigious and chillingly grand than any doctrine, and that spiritual needs can be met by its contemplation. Belief is otiose; reality is sufficiently awesome as it stands.

Mysticism

The contemporary ‘god’ is laughable

  • The usual perception of God is pitiable. That there is an omnipotent 'force' twiddling the dials.
  • God, if he exists, is manifest. He is Lord beyond comprehension. He *is* the universe, and thus the universe in its entire sublimity, violence, beauty, and scope is both him and his expression. The expression is cripplingly wondrous. The image of God as the bearded man who has personal stakes in our conflicts, let alone one who cares about a man marrying a man, or who distributed books with special rules isn't even funny, it's pitiable.
  • If anything, God's expression *is* the fight of our conflicts, and is on neither side, and has never been on anyone's 'side' throughout *all of history*. Instead, he is the expression of turmoil of bigotry, the fire of hatred, the bleakness and anguish of despair, suffering, and abuse. What he is showing is both bombs and vaccines, love and murder, and he weeps for every tear ever shed, and for every baby ever born, and he does the same for a trillion worlds beyond our own that we will never know.

Pantheism

Need more in here.

This is true piety

  • In handing over everything to the gods and making everything dependent on their whim. . . . Poor humanity! to saddle the gods with such responsibilities and throw in a vindictive temper! . . . This is not piety, this oft-repeated show of bowing a veiled head before a stone, this bustling to every altar, this deluging of altars with the blood of beasts. . . . True piety lies rather in the power to contemplate the universe with a quiet mind. (Book V, lines 1185 and 1194– 1203; emphasis mine)
  • Lucretius, *On the Nature of Things*.
  • Taken from Midgley, Mary. Science and Poetry.

The occult

I think this is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay overrated

  • Hermetics**
  • A syncretic system whose name is short-hand for the philosophical and temple teachings of Hellenistic Egypt. The central figure is that of Hermes Trismegitus - who is considered an incarnation of the gods Thoth (Tahuti) and Hermes - and the core teachings are his writings "The Emerald Tablet" and "Corpus Hermeticum".
  • The goal of Hermetic practice is enlightment through spiritual alchemy and theurgical ritual. There are also elements of practical magick and astrology involving the use of planetary talismans and horary charts. Hermetic magickal practices are the foundations for Renaissance European magick (via Agrippa) which went on to influence the Golden Dawn and ceremonial magick as a whole.
  • Strictly Hermetic groups tend to be occult groups of a ceremonial bent or esoteric orders.
  • Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (Ceremonial Magick)**
  • Combining elements of Hermetics, Rosicrucianism, Freemasonry, and Renaissance European magick, the Golden Dawn system is the foundation for most of what constitutes Western Occultism and "high magick". The Golden Dawn used a grade system similar to a fraternal lodge where the initiate progresses after demonstrating knowledge, ability, and the willingness to undertake various oaths of secrecy.
  • The Golden Dawn teachings involve an intensive study of the Qabalah, tarot, and an extensive set of ornate rituals involving Christian, Jewish, Hellenistic, and Egyptian myth and symbolism. The goal of this path is spirtual perfection and the attainment of life goals.
  • There are a plethora of orders and groups still operating under the Golden Dawn name. Unfortunately, most of them also seem to be in constant conflict with each other over lineage and rights to the name and future of the system.
  • Thelema**
  • The tradition founded by Aleister Crowley. Crowley, an intiate of the Golden Dawn, believed himself the Prophet of the New Aeon as fortold in Liber AL vel Legis or "Book of the Law". Crowley claimed this book was dictated to him by praeternatrual intelligence named "Aiwass". The book describes a procession of "Aeons" that mark different periods in human history and fortells the coming Aeon of Horus. Thelema is intened to be the new religion for the Aeon of Horus or The Crowned and Conquering Child.
  • The Book is the source the infamous axiom "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law." This has been erroneously translated to "do whatever you want". In fact, the "wilt" here refers to the True Will, or highest purpose, inherent in every individual. The term can also be found in the commonly quoted definition of magick: "The art and science of causing change in conformity with Will".
  • Thelemic cosmology has multiple god-forms, but the three most important are Nuit (Our Lady of the Stars), Hadit (The Solar God/Horus), and Ra-Hoor-Khuit (The Crowned and Conquering Child). Other gods mentioned in Thelemic rituals and works are Pan, Choronzon, Harpocrates, and Babalon, the Sacred Whore and her beastly mount Therion.
  • As Crowley was a GD intiate, Thelemic practices retain a lot similarities to that of the GD. Both involve intensive study of Qabalah, tarot, and various elaborate rituals for the intiate to master. Crowley was antagonistic to the church, so he removed a lot of Judeo-Christian language and symbolism from the rituals and replaced them with references to Thelemic cosmology. He also developed his own tarot deck, the "Thoth" deck, and wrote a companion book - The Book of Thoth - which is considered a classic text on the tarot. Thelema also places utilizes Eastern methods of mysticism and self-mastery like yoga, tantra, buddhist meditation, and sexual alchemy.
  • The goal of Thelema is knowing and being in alignment with your True Will. This is done through many methods, but the most commonly acknowledged is the Knowledge and Conversation of the Holy Guardian Angel. The Holy Guardian Angel, or higher self, is seen as the initiate's guide to knowing their True Will.
  • The two main organizations currently active in Thelema are the Ordo Templi Orientis and the A.'. A.'..
  • Chaos Magick**
  • Chaos Magick is a system of magickal thought developed in the late 70's and into the early 80's by Peter J. Carroll and Ray Sherwin. CM borrows heavily from the DIY and anti-authoritarian ethos of punk rock, Discordianism and Robert Anton Wilson, quantum physics, chaos theroy, and the work of artist and occultist Austin Osman Spare.
  • Chaos Magick is practical, results-oriented magick. The Chaos Magick axiom "Nothing is true, everything is permitted" means that the Chaote should feel free to use any and all means to achieve results so long as it works. Ideas of spiritual perfection and enlightenment, overall, are not important to most Chaotes as they are with traditional high magicians. The principals behind CM are "belief-shifting", "belief as a tool", gnosis.
  • Belief-shifting is the idea of utilizing all methods of magick regardless of the contradictions they may hold against each other for examples. These contradicitons are mitigated by the philosophy of "belief as a tool" or that the emotional and psychological investment in the ritual is more important than the words or actions performed. Gnosis is an altered state of consciousness likened to the Buddhist concept of "samadhi" in which the meditator achieves union with the Buddha-mind via complete mental vacuity. It is believed that the gnostic state of mind is where magick "happens". There are two kinds of gnostic trance: inhibitory and exciatory. The former is associated with sleeplessness, meditation, fasting, and hypnotic states. The later is associated with more active modes of trance like drumming, dance, sexual arousal, and flagellation.
  • Carroll and Sherwin opened a fraternal order called the Illuminates of Thanateros which is one of the few magickal orders still heavily active today. The order has five degrees with initiate advancement based on demonstration of knowledge and ability. However, it can be reasonably stated that the majority portion of the CM community works alone or in self-formed groups.
  • Neo-Paganism**
  • Mostly associated with Wicca, Neo-Paganism also includes Heathenry, Druidism, Neo-Shamanism, and various forms of contemporary Goddess theology. Neo-Pagans often stress that their path's are a religion first and a method of magick second. Neo-Paganism could also include traditions outside of the West such as Chinese folk religion or the various syncretic religions of Japan.
  • Neo-Pagans are the most visible and active members of the occult community. Most Unitarian Universalist churches have an "Earth-Based Spirituality" meeting group and there are dozens of large-scale festivals and celebrations that take place only a few hours away from even the remotest small town. There is also a cottage industry of publishers, record labels, and magazines devotes to Neo-Pagan topics and issues. Arguably, one could even say there is a whole city dedicated to it: Salem, Massachusetts.
  • Outside of Druidism and Heathenry, most take an eclectic approach to magickal practices and freely borrow ideas from other spiritual traditions. It's not uncommon for some Wiccans to be involved in with practices outside of their tradition such as Reiki, yoga, or even Thelema. Druidism and Heathenry, however, are "reconstructionist" traditions that attempt to rebuild the old religious practices of a particular culture. In the case of Heathenry, it's the religion of the pagan Norse. In Druidism, that of the Iron Age Celtic priesthood.
  • Most Wiccan groups tend to be private covens, but Druidism and Heathenry both have rather robust organizations in America or abroad. The most active orders in Druidism are Ár nDraíocht Féin, Reformed Druids of North America, and The Order of Bards, Ovates, and Druids in the U.K.. For Heathenry, there is The Ring of Troth and the Asatru Alliance both of which are based in the United States.
  • From <http://www.reddit.com/r/occult/comments/v7dzy/occultism_101_types_of_occultism_pt_1/>

Yamabushi

Hippies

They definitely have a history with this concept

Kings are nothing

  • Kings are nothing.
  • But administrators of men
  • Spirituality is the only road
  • That has an end.
  • Kings are nothing.
  • But administrators of men
  • Priests and parents ...
  • That has an end.